What is a feasible region?

A feasible region is a fundamental concept in linear programming and optimization. It refers to the set of all possible points that satisfy a given set of inequalities or constraints. In simpler terms, it’s the area where all the conditions of a problem are met.

Key Characteristics of a Feasible Region

Constraints

The feasible region is defined by a system of inequalities. For example, consider the following inequalities:
$x + y leq 10$
$x geq 0$
$y geq 0$
These inequalities represent the constraints that a solution must satisfy.

Graphical Representation

To understand a feasible region better, let’s visualize it. Imagine you are plotting the inequalities on a coordinate plane. The area where all the shaded regions overlap is the feasible region. For instance, if we plot the above inequalities, the feasible region will be a triangle bounded by the lines $x + y = 10$, the x-axis, and the y-axis.

Bounded and Unbounded Regions

A feasible region can be either bounded or unbounded. A bounded feasible region is enclosed within a finite area, like a polygon. An unbounded feasible region extends infinitely in at least one direction. For example, if the inequalities were $x + y geq 10$, $x geq 0$, and $y geq 0$, the feasible region would extend infinitely to the right and upwards.

Importance in Optimization

In optimization problems, particularly linear programming, the feasible region is crucial because it contains all the potential solutions to the problem. The goal is to find the optimal solution within this region, usually by maximizing or minimizing a linear objective function, such as $z = 3x + 4y$. The optimal solution will be located at one of the vertices (corner points) of the feasible region.

Example Problem

Let’s solve a simple linear programming problem to illustrate the concept of a feasible region.

Problem

Maximize $z = 3x + 4y$ subject to the constraints:
$x + y leq 10$
$x geq 0$
$y geq 0$

Solution

  1. Plot the constraints: Draw the lines $x + y = 10$, $x = 0$, and $y = 0$ on a graph.
  2. Identify the feasible region: The feasible region is the area where all these constraints overlap, which forms a triangle.
  3. Find the vertices: The vertices of the triangle are (0,0), (10,0), and (0,10).
  4. Evaluate the objective function at each vertex:
  • At (0,0): $z = 3(0) + 4(0) = 0$
  • At (10,0): $z = 3(10) + 4(0) = 30$
  • At (0,10): $z = 3(0) + 4(10) = 40$
  1. Determine the optimal solution: The maximum value of $z$ is 40 at the vertex (0,10).

Conclusion

Understanding the feasible region is essential for solving linear programming problems. It helps visualize the set of all possible solutions and identify the optimal one. By mastering this concept, you can tackle more complex optimization problems with confidence.

Citations

  1. 1. Khan Academy – Solving Systems of Inequalities
  2. 2. Wolfram MathWorld – Feasible Region
  3. 3. MIT OpenCourseWare – Linear Programming

Related

(2) O3 + H → O2 + OH k2 = 1.78×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (3) O + OH → O2 + H k3 = 4.40×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (5) O + HO2 → O2 + OH k5 = 3.50×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (6) H + HO2 → O2 + H2 k6 = 5.40×10^-12 cm^3 s^-1 (9) OH + HO2 → O2 + H2O2 k9 = 4.00×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (10) HO2 + HO2 → O2 + H2O2 k10 = 2.50×10^-12 cm s^-1 (11) O + O2 + M → O3 + M k11 = 1.05×10^-34 cm^6 s^-1 (14) H + O2 + M → HO2 + M k14 = 8.08×10^-32 cm^6 s^-1 (15) H + H + M → H2O + M k15 = 3.31×10^-27 cm^6 s^-1 (16) O2 + hv → 2 O k16 = (1.26×10^-8 s^-1) φ (17) H2O + hv → H + OH k17 = (3.4×10^-6 s^-1) φ (18) O3 + hv → O2 + O k18 = (7.10×10^-5 s^-1) φ

Table 1 Reactions, rate constants and activation energies used in the model* No. Reaction kopt (M⁻¹ s⁻¹) 1 OH + H₂ → H + H₂O 3.74 x 10⁷ 2 OH + HO₂ → HO₂ + OH⁻ 5 x 10⁹ 3 OH + H₂O₂ → HO₂ + H₂O 3.8 x 10⁷ 4 OH + O₂ → O₂ + OH 9.96 x 10⁹ 5 OH + HO₂ → O₂ + H₂O 7.1 x 10⁹ 6 OH + OH → H₂O₂ 5.3 x 10⁹ 7 OH + e⁻aq → OH⁻ 3 x 10¹⁰ 8 H + O₂ → HO₂ 2.0 x 10¹⁰ 9 H + HO₂ → H₂O₂ 2.0 x 10¹⁰ 10 H + H₂O₂ → OH + H₂O 3.44 x 10⁷ 11 H + OH → H₂O 1.4 x 10¹⁰ 12 H + H → H₂ 1.94 x 10¹⁰ 13 e⁻aq + O₂ → O₂⁻ 1.9 x 10¹⁰ 14 e⁻aq + O₂ → HO₂⁻ + OH⁻ 1.3 x 10¹⁰ 15 e⁻aq + HO₂ 2.0 x 10¹⁰ 16 e⁻aq + H₂O₂ 1.1 x 10¹⁰ 17 e⁻aq + HO₂ → OH + OH⁻ 1.3 x 10¹⁰ 18 e⁻aq + H⁺ → H 2.3 x 10¹⁰ 19 e⁻aq + e⁻aq → H₂ + OH⁻ + OH⁻ 2.5 x 10⁹ 20 HO₂ + O₂ → O₂ + HO₂ 1.3 x 10⁹ 21 HO₂ + HO₂ → O₂ + H₂O₂ 8.3 x 10⁵ 22 HO₂ + HO₂ → O₂ + OH + H₂O 3.7 23 HO₂ + HO₂ → O₂ + O₂ + OH + H₂O 7 x 10⁵ s⁻¹ 24 H⁺ + O₂⁻ → HO₂ 4.5 x 10¹⁰ 25 H⁺ + O₂⁻ → O₂ 2.0 x 10¹⁰ 26 H⁺ + OH⁻ 1.4 x 10¹¹ 27 H⁺ + HO₂⁻ 2 x 10¹⁰ 28 H₂O₂ → HO₂ + H⁺ + OH⁻ 2.5 x 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹ 29 H₂O₂ → H⁺ + OH⁻ 1.4 x 10⁻⁷ s⁻¹ 30 O₂ + O₂ → O₂ + HO₂ + OH⁻ 0.3 31 O₂ + H₂O₂ → O₂ + OH + OH 16 32

(2) O3 + H → O2 + OH k2 = 1.78×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (3) O + OH → O2 + H k3 = 4.40×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (5) O + HO2 → O2 + OH k5 = 3.50×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (6) H2O + O → 2 OH k6 = 5.40×10^-12 cm^3 s^-1 (9) OH + HO2 → O2 + H2O k9 = 4.00×10^-11 cm^3 s^-1 (10) HO2 + HO2 → O2 + H2O2 k10 = 2.50×10^-12 cm s^-1 (11) O + O2 + M → O3 + M k11 = 1.05×10^-34 cm^6 s^-1 (14) H + O2 + M → HO2 + M k14 = 8.08×10^-32 cm^6 s^-1 (15) OH + H + M → H2O + M k15 = 3.31×10^-27 cm^6 s^-1 (16) O2 + hv → 2 O k16 = (1.26×10^-8 s^-1) φ (17) H2O + hv → H + OH k17 = (3.4×10^-6 s^-1) φ (18) O3 + hv → O2 + O k18 = (7.10×10^-8 s^-1) φ